![]() ![]() Both, moreover, display what I might term ‘the growth of consensus politics among Civil War historians’, establishing their work in a sequence produced by those with whom they differ only on details. Both are monographs, produced by professionals with a long career of research behind them, basing their work on an analysis of all surviving sources for their subjects. Oxford University Press, 2004 - History - 814 pages. ![]() Both possess other similarities, which mark them as belonging to the same stage in the life of man as historian. Austin Woolrych breathes life back into the story of these years, the sweep of his prose buttressed by the authority of a lifetimes scholarship. The two latest books upon the period represent, in very different ways, the latest developments in the second tradition. This course explores the history of Britain and of England in particular in a period. In the past few generations the division has tended to be drawn instead between the followers of Karl Marx and those of Samuel Gardiner, between those who see political action as an expression of tensions within society as a whole and those who see the vital political events as occurring at the centre and echoing in the provinces. In previous centuries most histories of the English Revolution were coloured by the rival ideologies of Royalist and Roundhead. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |